Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cosmas Odinaka's avatar

1. What is the larger goal with vertical short-form videos?

To empower creators with a new, engaging format to grow their audience, deepen relationships, and drive subscriptions—enhancing (not replacing) the core newsletter experience.

2. How might this affect newsletter vs. video engagement?

Boost discovery: Videos attract more eyeballs, especially mobile users.

Complement newsletters: Teasers or summaries can lead users to full posts.

Risk of distraction: If not integrated well, video may divert attention from core content.

Opportunity: Drive more cross-medium engagement and subscriptions when used strategically.

3. How would you measure success?

Creator Adoption

User Engagement

Qualitative Feedback

Expand full comment
Guilherme Storti's avatar

It’s really interesting to see Substack moving towards this more vocal and algorithmic format. It seems like a direct response to the difficulty many writers have in reaching new audiences. The question remains: will this discovery model prioritize consistency and depth, or will it end up favoring shallower, more viral content? I’ll be curious to see how this evolves.

1. What is the larger goal with the launch of vertical short-form videos?

To increase content discoverability and time-on-platform by adopting a familiar, addictive format (TikTok-style feed). The broader goal is to lower the friction between audiences and new writers, especially for creators who thrive in short, visual storytelling formats. It’s about expanding the top of the funnel and giving creators a new surface to express ideas quickly.

2. How might this feature affect engagement across newsletters vs. videos?

It may shift casual engagement toward short-form content, especially for readers who aren't ready to commit to full posts. But if done right, it can complement newsletters: videos become hooks, and newsletters deepen the relationship. But I also think that all of this comes with a risk: creators focusing too much on the algorithm, and less on depth.

3. If you were on the team, how would you measure the success of this launch?

- % of users who view at least one video per session

- Conversion rate from video view → newsletter subscription

- Time spent in the video feed vs. traditional reading time

- Creator adoption rate (% of active writers posting videos weekly)

- Retention uplift among new users exposed to videos in week 1

If I were the PM, I’d keep a close eye on whether this feature grows the reader base without compromising the writer-reader relationship that makes Substack special. Discovery shouldn’t come at the cost of depth.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts